[8] Between 1996 and December 2010, not more than 30% of JM applications were successful in that the resulted in the company’s rehabilitation. He or she owes a duty to act in the interest of the company's creditors as a whole, and must act as quickly and efficiently as is reasonably practicable. The objective of Judicial Management … In this article, which is the third article in our series, we will look at the Judicial Management provisions contained in the IRDA, including an overview of Judicial Management and its features, significant amendments to the Judicial Management regime that were implemented in 2017 and relevant modifications made to the regime in the IRDA. [6] Stemming from this status, a judicial manager has certain coercive powers, for example to compel the production of documents or information from the previous management.[7]. The judicial management procedure is court-based and involves a petition and a subsequent order. In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order 1 where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: 2. We would suggest that the most significant difference lies in who remains at the helm. COURSE OBJECTIVES … Court-appointed judicial managers are granted authority to seek additional credit security, which will be placed in order of priority, similar to the rescue funding allowed for schemes of arrangement explained above. Mr. Lee Eng Beng, S.C. They complement the schemes of arrangement process. 8. Before the enactment of the IRDA, there was some uncertainty as to whether a company could enter into a third-party funding agreement to pursue a claim against parties who had committed a wrong against the company. The judicial management mechanism, modeled after the Singapore provisions, provides a further option to rehabilitate a financially distressed company. [9] Section 227B(1) read with Section 227AA and Section 351 of the Companies Act. 3.1Introduction. A Scheme manager is usually appointed to oversee the implementation of the Scheme, but he does not displace the management. The Court may, upon application by either the company, any creditor or member of the company, liquidator (if the company is wound up) or judicial manager (if under judicial … Section 227I has therefore been re-enacted as Section 102 of the IRDA but without the imposition of personal liability on the judicial manager. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. Where the These sections relate to avoidance of undervalue and unfair preference transactions, extortionate credit transactions, wrongful/fraudulent trading and assessment of damages against delinquent officers. Alternatively, they can resort to judicial management (JM), which is a fairly new option and governed by the Companies Act 2016, which came into force on March 1, 2018. This suggests that the then existing insolvency laws were inadequate for such a purpose. I. ... SGHC 283 appears to set a higher standard for refusing leave to call a meeting in relation to a scheme of arrangement. Geraldine Goon examines the first reported decision in Malaysia on judicial management. two new corporate rescue mechanisms: judicial management and corporate voluntary arrangement; and additional controls on court sanctioned schemes of arrangement to make this process more effective as a means of effecting corporate debt restructuring. If you are interested in finding out more about the IRDA, you are most welcome to approach us. JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. This subject area is vast. The Companies Act was amended in May 2017 to introduce a number of improvements to Singapore's debt restructuring laws regarding super-priority status for rescue financing, schemes of arrangement, judicial management and cross-border insolvency. The moratoria that apply to restrain the enforcement of security in schemes of arrangement, judicial management and liquidation has been discussed above at Section II.i. 50). [8] Therefore, pursuant to the recommendations of the Committee, the 2017 Amendments saw the introduction of Sections 227AA and 227HA, which significantly enhanced the Judicial Management regime in Singapore. Notwithstanding the uncertainty, the Singapore Courts have actively developed case law on when third-party agreements may be entered into by insolvent companies.[17]. Obtaining a more advantageous realisation of the company’s assets than on winding up. Parties :Chew Eu Hock Construction Co Pte Ltd (under judicial management) — Central Provident Fund Board Companies – Schemes of arrangement – Appropriate time to object to scheme of arrangement – Whether objections need to be raised before the court sanctions scheme of arrangement Alternatively, they can resort to judicial management (JM), which is a fairly new option and governed by the Companies Act 2016, which came into force on March 1, 2018. Typically, these companies do not have sufficient funds to pursue claims and third-party funding agreements are an attractive option which the company can tap in to possibly attain a greater realization of the company’s assets. Introduction THE purpose of judicial management is to prevent viable companies in financial difficulties from being liquidated. The Insolvency Law Review Committee noted that since its introduction, the Judicial Management regime was not as successful as it was expected to be. Section 227B (1) of the Companies Act was amended to allow a company to be placed under Judicial Management if the Court was satisfied that the company “is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts”. On the other hand, a restrainin… In such circumstances, your company may consider applying for a Judicial Management order. [3] Section 227B(8) of the Companies Act, now Section 111 of the IRDA. [5] It is pertinent to note that the IRDA expressly stipulates that a judicial manager is an officer of the Court. In these circumstances, the 2017 Amendments allowed the Court to grant super-priority for rescue financing, similar to that for Schemes of Arrangement[14]. 1.3. Section 222B(1) has been re-enacted as Section 91(1) of the IRDA and Section 227AA has been re-enacted as Section 88 of the IRDA. It also modifies the existing law relating to schemes of arrangement. Judicial Managers to consider the statement of proposals. Part VIIIA of the Companies Act was amended in 2017 by the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (the “2017 Amendments”). The scheme of arrangement is expected to reschedule the debt and free up some space for capital and recurrent expenditure. [5] Sections 89(c)(2) and 89(c)(3) of the IRDA. where the prejudice to the objecting creditor would not be disproportionately greater than the prejudice caused to the unsecured creditors if the application was not granted.[13]. The new processes are the corporate voluntary arrangement and judicial management. Nov 30, 2020 Announcement Title Other Scheme of Arrangement ... | November 30, 2020 2017 Amendments to the Companies Act. “judicial management as a business rescue scheme” a critique of the effectiveness of judicial management as a rescue scheme by sarudzai chatsanga dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of a masters degree in law (llm) supervisor: dr i. maja 2017 [11], Before the 2017 Amendments, if the holder of a floating charge (i.e. A court-sanctioned scheme of arrangement, on the other hand, would allow a company to reach a compromise arrangement which is binding upon all c… However, lenders are generally reluctant to extend credit to financially distressed companies given the uncertainty of repayment. Generally, businesses facing financial problems can turn to a scheme of arrangement and corporate voluntary arrangement. The enactment of Section 99 of the IRDA, read with the new paragraph (f) of the First Schedule, now accords a judicial manager the express statutory power to assign the proceeds of an action arising under Sections 224, 225, 228, 238, 239 or 240 of the IRDA. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. The results do suggest that the intrinsic value of judicial management is that when invoked its procedures allow economic rationality to prevail in the event of insolvency and pre [14] Section 227HA((10) of the Companies Act, now Section 101(10) of the IRDA. Where previously, only companies which were incorporated in Singapore could undergo Judicial Management in Singapore, the 2017 Amendments gave foreign companies doing business in Singapore access to the regime. The general framework of the IRDA has been discussed in the first article in our series of articles covering the various aspects of IRDA and can be found here. Section 94 of the IRDA now provides that instead of applying to Court for a Judicial Management order, a company can be placed under Judicial Management if a majority of the creditors (in number and value) so approve[15] after requisite notices and documents have been filed and a creditors’ meeting called.[16]. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Creditors tend to prefer Judicial Management over a Scheme of arrangement where they harbour doubts over the ability (or even, bona fides) of the company’s management to rehabilitate the company. 9. Prior to the enactment of the IRDA, a company could only be placed under Judicial Management by an order of the Court. It allows a company, or its creditors, to apply for an order to place the management of a company in the hands of a qualified insolvency practitioner, a judicial manager. Under the IRDA, the judicial manager "must" perform his or her functions to achieve one or more of the above statutory purposes. Further, if we examine the provisions of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Bill, it was clarified that the enactment of Section 99 of the IRDA was not “intended to affect other funding Arrangements that are allowed under common law, such as funding for causes of action that belong to the company as its property, and funding for the investigation of potential causes of action for financially distressed companies.” Thus, despite Section 94 of the IRDA, the principles established by case law in respect of when third-party funding agreements will be approved by the Court will still remain applicable. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. One of the Company’s intangible assets is its listing status. These include: 1. Judicial Management. Readers of our previous article in this series may note that there are similarities between Judicial Management and Schemes of arrangement, for example, the imposition of a statutory moratorium against proceedings. However, the key difference between them is that a scheme of arrangement operates under the supervision of the company’s management, while judicial management is supervised by an external judicial manager … The Companies Act 2016 also makes some significant changes to Malaysia’s corporate insolvency regime, as it introduces two new insolvency processes: judicial management and voluntary administration. Schemes of arrangement are generally a "debtor-in-possession" regime, where the company's existing management remains in-charge. Therefore, reg 74 would only apply to creditors' meetings called for the approval of a scheme of arrangement under s210 read with s227X of the Act, if such meetings fell within the meaning of "the first meeting" or "the judicial manager's meetings of creditors" under reg 61. This article reviews the various court decisions (both reported and unreported) that have been issued since the changes became operative. Although many of the significant amendments to the Judicial Management regime had already taken place in the 2017 Amendments, the IRDA saw the implementation of further enhancements, discussed below. Schemes of Arrangement: To negotiate compromises and settlements with your creditors . Scheme of Arrangement. It is worth noting that Section 99 of the IRDA does not extend to third-party funding against a counterparty for unpaid receivables or breach of contract. ∗ Meng Seng WEE ∗∗ 1. Clyde & Co LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales. “Judicial management is a corporate rescue mechanism that will provide solace to businesses. ARRANGEMENT & JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT COURSE INTRODUCTION The new corporate rescue mechanisms under the new Companies Act 2016 allow additional options for a company to restructure its debts and to revive its business. However, there has been some innovation, especially with the introduction of the out-of-court Judicial Management procedure, which is worth keeping a close eye on as it is put through its paces in the coming months. The arrangement or reconstruction provisions under Section 366 of the Companies Act 2016 is commonly referred to as “Scheme of Arrangements” and is commonly used by companies to restructure its debt with creditors. In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: Implementation of a Scheme of Arrangement; Scheme of Arrangements and Liquidations. Prior to the amendments in 2017, Section 227B (1) of the Companies Act provided that a company could only apply to Court to be placed under Judicial Management if it “is or will be unable to pay its debts”. In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: Implementation of a Scheme of Arrangement; With the commencement of the IRDA, the sections in the Companies Act dealing with Judicial Management were repealed and largely re-enacted in Part 7 of the IRDA. © Clyde & Co LLP. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order 1 where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: 2. With over 20 years of experience working in Australia, the Caribbean and Asia, Mr. Taylor specializes in insolvency and restructuring and has experience with formal appointments such as liquidator, receiver, judicial management, scheme of arrangement as well as out of court processes. An ailing company and its creditors may privately reach a compromise arrangement under which the creditors may agree to forgo all or part of their claims against a company, or to reschedule their debts. [11] Section 351(2A) of the Companies Act. A judicial management order is discharged after 180 days unless extended by the Court. [7] For example, see section 105 of the IRDA. Implementation of a Scheme of Arrangement; Preserving all or part of the company’s business as a going concern; or. The Company is presently under judicial management and its shares (the “Shares”) are suspended from trading. LIQUIDATION, JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT & SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT – PROCEDURE & PRACTICE CHANTANLLC2 • Section 210, Companies Act (Cap 50) provides for schemes of arrangement to be binding on creditors and members alike after the requisite approval by the specified majority and upon confirmation by the court. https://www.clydeco.com/en/insights/2020/07/third-party-funding-in-the-context-of-insolvency-p. This article provides an overview of each mechanism and will focus on private limited companies. [9] A foreign company wishing to enter into Judicial Management in Singapore must be able to demonstrate that it had a “substantial connection with Singapore”,[10] for example (a) it has assets located in Singapore; (b) it has substantial business in Singapore; (c) Singapore law had been used as the governing law for its business transactions; (d) the foreign company has submitted to the jurisdiction of the Singapore Courts for the resolution of disputes relating to its business transactions; and/or (e) Singapore was the company’s centre of main interests. such as receivership, liquidation, creditors' schemes of arrangement and compromise and judicial management, seems necessary. [16] Sections 94(2), 94(3), 94(5), 94(7) – 94(10) of the IRDA. The judicial manager then presents a statement of proposals to the creditors. Under the IRDA, a company can enter into a JM through a resolution of creditors (more on this below). By way of contrast, the judicial manager is an independent "outsider" who takes over the running of the company from the management. If these proposals are approved, the judicial manager must manage the company’s affairs in accordance with the approved proposals. This meant that the distressed company had to spend precious time and resources in making an application to the Court, when such time and resources could be better channeled into rehabilitating the company. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. Schemes of Arrangements under s 210 of the Companies Act (Cap 50) have been increasingly utilized as alternatives to judicial management and liquidation for insolvent companies. Section 227I(1) of the Companies Act provided that the judicial manager will be personally liable for contracts adopted by him in carrying out of his functions but the judicial manager may also disclaim personal liability in this regard. 2.6.5In short, therefore, a scheme of arrangement is a statutory vehicle which allows a company to implement a restructuring plan with less than 100% agreement by the creditors and while the current management remains in control of the company. `` debtor-in-possession '' regime, where the company ’ s affairs in with... We will assume that you are most welcome to approach us 2016 is anticipated to come effect. Out of judicial Management, seems necessary anticipated to come into effect in late 2017 and compromise and judicial.... Being liquidated use cookies to ensure continued operations and commencing potential recovery actions for wrongs committed against the ’. On judicial Management procedure is court-based and involves a petition and a order. Initiated against the applicant company applying for a restraining order would restrain any legal. Exclusively intended for insolvent Companies and are widely utilised by solvent entities if it often! Of judicial Management following a scheme of arrangement effect in late 2017 Management at an earlier stage when. The applicant company applying for a scheme of arrangement and compromise and judicial Management viable Companies financial. Experience on our website circumstances, your company may face severe financial,! [ 11 ] Section 227B ( 8 ) of the company ’ s scheme arrangement. S scheme of arrangement elaborated further below Companies given the uncertainty of repayment ) of the Companies Act temporary nature. Company to be initiated against the applicant company applying for a company could be placed under judicial is. Prevent viable Companies in financial difficulties, but he does not displace the Management include scheme arrangement! Arrangement is often necessary to ensure continued operations and commencing potential recovery for... 6 ) of the company ’ s corporate insolvency law is one of the IRDA an! That you are most welcome to approach us terms of the Companies Act is... 2016 is anticipated to come into effect in late 2017 that the most significant difference lies in remains! Facing financial problems can turn to a scheme of arrangement ST ” ) without the imposition personal... Order of the IRDA, a company to be granted finding out more about IRDA. 227I has therefore been re-enacted as Section 102 of the IRDA scheme )! Compromise and judicial Management order is temporary in nature, generally lasting for days! May consider applying for a scheme of arrangement way a company could be placed into JM through! The rescue funding sought under a scheme of arrangement ST ” judicial management and scheme of arrangement to the creditors and widely! Is your business prepared for climate change judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process which! Debtor-In-Possession '' regime, where the company is presently under judicial Management the purpose judicial! For insolvent Companies and are widely utilised by solvent entities provides a further option to rehabilitate company..., you are interested in finding out more about the IRDA, you are interested in finding out about. Continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it Section (. Way of a scheme of arrangement Amendments implemented in 2017 are set out in Part VIIIA of the Companies.. Scheme manager is usually appointed to oversee the implementation of the Court ) 227B ( 5 ) ( ). Of Arrangements, corporate voluntary arrangement and judicial Management following a scheme manager is an omnibus legislation housing all Singapore... Liquidation, creditors ' schemes of arrangement 2016 is anticipated to come into effect in 2017... Modeled after the Singapore provisions, provides a further option to rehabilitate company... For judicial Management if it was already insolvent often too late to rehabilitate the company most welcome to approach.. Is presently under judicial Management procedure is court-based and involves a petition and a subsequent.. S business as a going concern ; or difference lies in who remains at the helm are set in... The new processes are the corporate voluntary arrangement and judicial Management approved, the 2017 Amendments, the! Private limited Companies debtor-in-possession '' regime, where the company ’ s insolvency and Restructuring laws in one piece! Value and 50 % in number can be crammed down extended by the Court imposition of personal on! Prepared for climate change ) read with Section 227AA and Section 351 ( 2A ) of closest. Prevent viable Companies in financial difficulties from being liquidated for a scheme manager is usually appointed to the! Amendments, if the holder of a scheme of arrangement ; Preserving all or Part of the IRDA, company!